Reading Like a Lawyer - by Prof. Ruth Mckinney
http://www.unc.edu/~ramckinn/Documents/AddendumB-BeginningChecklist.pdf
Getting in a Good Reading Groove
Developing new habits takes conscious effort. The best way to
develop healthy reading habits in law is to force yourself to
think consciously about what you are reading and how you are reading
it. This addendum introduces you to a beginning checklist you
can reproduce (copies available online at http://www.unc.edu/~ramckinn)
and use for the next several weeks as you read cases. This beginning
checklist is long too long to use forever or on every case
you are reading. However, as you learn to read law like an expert
law student, you should use it on at least one case a day in each
of your classes for the first two or three weeks of school.
After you have integrated the questions raised in this checklist
into your daily reading habits (so that the questions come up
in your mind automatically and you are reading with these questions
in the back of your head), you can (and should) shift to the second
Checklist (Focus and Enjoy) found in Appendix C. That
checklist is designed to condense the questions raised in the
beginners checklist into four succinct and efficient questions
that you should ask yourself each and every time you read a case
throughout law school. By chunking the questions raised in the
first checklist into the broader questions raised in the second,
you will be moving from a beginner stage to an expert stage of
casebook reading. If you try to use the second checklist (Appendix
C) first, it wont do the same thing for you. Instead, you
may find that you miss information altogether (instead of including
it automatically) because you wont have developed the right
reading groove through practice.
Beginning Case-Reading Checklist
(Developing the Right Reading Habits)
A. Before You Read the Case
My purpose for reading this case today is: __________
I have the following amount of time to complete my reading: _________
I have looked at many of the following external cues:
____ Course Title
____ Table of Contents
____ Course Syllabus
____ Background Reading in Text
____ Section Heading & Sub-heading
____ Running Header
____ Other cases in this cluster
____ Notes & Problems
____ Case Name & Citation
____ Judges Name & Stature
I am aware of the following internal cues/thoughts:
____ I have prior knowledge about this area of the law
____ I have prior knowledge about the era or geographical location
of decision
____ I have prior knowledge about these facts
____ I have some emotional reactions to this topic or the area
or date of decision
I have the following hypothesis about what this case will show
and how it will fit in my professors overall plan for this
course: _____
I am guessing that the following words might be key magic
words (see Chapter 11) that will characterize rules & principles
in this area of the law: ____________
B. As You Read the Case:
____ I marked sections that made no sense and decided whether
to figure them out or move on. If I decided to figure them out,
I did the following:
___ made an inference from the content
___ looked up a word in a legal dictionary
___ asked a peer, an upperclass student, or my professor
___ reread the section more carefully
___ read ahead to see if there were cues later in the case
___ paraphrased in my own words, using Plain English
___ other
____ I asked questions of the opinions author (the judge)
and/or responded to thoughts the judge expressed in the opinion.
____ I visualized the operative conflict facts in living color
____ I can explain accurately to a layperson how this case wound
through the courts and got here (see Chapter 9).
____ I have modified or affirmed my original hypothesis about
this case at various points.
____ I have made up at least one hypothetical to test what I think
the rule is in this case.
____ I am still confused about:
____ I feel satisfied about:
____ If there were related Notes & Problems, I
read them and they caused me to also think about:
C. After Reading the Case:
I believe the main point of reading this case in the context of
this course is to learn: _________
The main point this case contributes to my coursework is based
on the following broader policy considerations or big-picture
rationales (why is this result fair or a good idea):
_______
If the decision had been mine to make at the time this case was
decided, I would:
____ agree
____ disagree
Because:
If the decision were mine to make today (not when the case was
decided), I (personally) would:
____ reach a similar result under similar facts
____ reach a different result
Because: _____________
D. After Reading a Cluster of Related Cases and Text:
In addition to the authors choice of cases themselves, the
authors background information and related Notes & Problems
caused me to speculate that the following are common themes in
this area of law: __________
The specific issues/factors/elements are the kind of things a
judge would consider if faced with a new conflict arising in this
area of law: __________
Stated succinctly, the majority rule appears to be: __________
Stated succinctly, alternative rules (if applicable) appear to
be: __________
Stated succinctly, the following exceptions or defenses appear
to exist to this rule: __________
The big-picture policy/fairness reasons for the development of
these rules appears to be: __________
These policy reasons should be balanced against the following
potentially conflicting policy/fairness concerns: __________
The key (magic) words that hold special meaning (beyond
a laypersons meaning) in this area of law are:__________
advanced reading check list
Addendum C
Advanced Reading Checklist
(Focus & Enjoy)
This addendum introduces you to an advanced reading checklist
you can reproduce (copies available at http://www.unc.edu/~ramckinn)
and use whenever you read cases once youve integrated the
kinds of questions raised in the Beginning Reading Checklist (Appendix
B) into your daily reading. As a supplement to briefing, you can
use this checklist (or think about the questions it contains)
to help advance your reading. Eventually you should strive to
integrate these questions into your daily reading habits (so that
the questions come up in your mind automatically and you are reading
with these questions in the back of your head).
1. What is the exact legal question in front of the court (that
pertains to the sub-topic of the course in this section of the
casebook)?
2. What is the courts exact answer to this question?
3. In the courts mind, why does this answer make sense?
4. Keeping the importance of deductive reasoning in mind (Major
Premise, Minor Premise, Conclusion) what would you personally
have decided if youd been the judge? Why? What other decisions
could have been rationally made?
5. What does this case add to your understanding of this section
of the course?
Logic and Legal Reasoning for the Law Student
http://www.unc.edu/~ramckinn/Documents/NealRameeGuide.pdf