The History of Law

history of Law


The precise meaning of law is difficult to determine because, despite their varying empirical definitions, all three systems have a underlying uniformity in their treatments. Even within each of the above defined systems, individuals will find clear rules unique to their own reaching conclusions that apply equally to individuals, groups, and firms.

The trinity of rule-making, namely the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary, provides checks and balances to ensure that state and federal agencies, and even remote third parties, act correctly in meeting their objectives. Throughquetory and preservation of idols, such as the European Union’s acquis sovereignty, and federalism, the state and its various subdivisions are guided by (implicitly or explicitly) their constitutional right to regulate in the public interest.

The origins of law is directly traceable to the idea of public utility. Jobs in the law profession can be sorted into three basic categories: those that involve debates about the interpretation of written laws; those that involve the drafting and revision of laws; and those that involve the administration of laws by judges and juries.

The first and third jobs are those that involve the most controversy. Although the drafting and revision of written laws constitute a crucial part of the process of creating and maintaining the rules of civil justice, the two others — pushing and proposing laws — require little argument, and are thus safer. Those pushing for changes in laws are called advocates.

An advocate is not necessarily the author of the draft. In fact, he or she is properly referred to as an amicus, or interested party. With respect to the final laws being proposed, “lawyer, attorney, judges, criminologists, journalists, landlords, business owners, and any other individuals who choose to be in ‘the association’ for the advocacy of their particular view” are listed as advocates.

The last job in drafting is that of promulgating and making national announcements. Kennedy, Lincoln, and Jackson, as well as many others, were advocates of ‘cooperative federalism.’ By achieving the necessary compromises among the states, the nation as a whole gained something of a relaxation from the harassment of the state governments by the federal government. The South had been completely defeated by the North following the American Civil War.

Advocates of the anti-federal trend among the states considered strikes, boycotts, threats, and revolution. Only two decades later, the Supreme Court broadened the concept of collective v possessive elements in a groundbreaking decision,Palmer v. Ferguson Cases. In those cases, the Court held that it was not unconstitutional for a person to part with money that he or she owns for the sole purpose of engaging in a boycott of a particular industry.

Despite the fact that federalism was considered a successful philosophy for the establishment of the nation, it was not without its share of controversy, despite the fact that it directly opposed the views of many people. As a result, advocates of the principles of federalism had to use it as a stick to fight against the enlargement of slavery and to claim their rightful place in the sympathetic sentiments of the oppressed. Over time, their efforts became more and more concerted, and the rich supported the states that were strong in resistance to the federal government.

The first 50 years of our lives were considered to be the foundations of our democracy; an enormous task was undertaken to transform the country into a confederation of disarmed free states. The move was considered necessary because of the federalist beliefs of the majority of the membership. While it was considered a step toward attaining the goal of organized labor, on the whole the new Constitution was seen to be a step toward the goal of freedom.

The third article of the Constitution stated that congress has the right to regulate commerce among the states, meaning that it has the right to establish an internal police and government for the nation as a whole. The framing and adoption of this document had been the focus of the House of Representatives and the Senate, with the understanding that it would finally determine whether the nation would be a free nation or slavery based.

The purpose of the incorporating act was to unite the various states that had been part of the nation, whether by being a part of it or by existing in it. It further stated that no power, territory or population rights would be accepted by the states that passed this act such as baby birds for sale. It further declared that congress had the right to regulate slavery within the states.

Slave holding was contrary to the laws of Spain and Andorra, Portugal, Georgia, and age old traditions of European civilization. Despite fierce opposition from the lower classes and intellectual classes, the act passed. (1787)

The Police of the Mississippi was an internal state withorial policy that answers to the officers and soldiers of the counties. The signatories were committed to the accomplishment of creating a strong law and order in Mississippi.